TWCL

[Alohilani]

I'm starting up my first webcomic. I have the first 'issue' (really only a prologue-ical half-issue) sketched out; and I'm ready to begin lineart/coloring.

However, I find myself facing a dilemma. I am more comfortable using traditional media than digital due to more familiarity with traditional and time constraints I have on using the computer, but digital seems to be the 'it' thing these days. In fact, I'm worried that if I color my comics with markers instead of the GIMP I'll lack visual appeal and people won't read it. Another point for digital is the fact that it's so much more customizable; you have infinite options for coloring, line style, etc. And pretty effects. And the ever-essential undo button.

But, on the other hand- a lot of webcomics ARE digital. Therefore, if mine is not, it is *ahem* 'different' and 'unique', which can be eye-catching. (It can also be used as a polite synonym for 'sucks' but that's not how we're using it here.) And, since I feel more comfortable with the traditional medium, perhaps now is not the time to experiment?

Traditional comics would be a lot easier on me the artist, meaning I have a better chance of Updating On Time. (In case anyone's wondering, this is what my traditional art looks like as opposed to my digital art. Those are characters from the webcomic in question as well.)

Of course, there are compromises; I can do the comic in markers and then fix errors and maybe add a few effects on the computer. I could do traditional lineart and color it digitally, or I could do the lineart digitally, then print it out and color it traditionally. I could only do 'flat' colors with the markers and shade digitally, etc.

But my question to you is, does using traditional or digital art have a major effect on how many people read a comic? What do you, personally, prefer- if you have a preference?

I know there's really no 'right or wrong' way to do a comic; but I'm curious.

Also, forgive me if I just said something stupid and/or rehashed an old issue; I'm new. I scouted though, say, the first three or four pages of old topics in this section and couldn't find a topic like this so I figured if someone HAD brought it up before, it would be more annoying to ressurect an oldtopic than to make a new one.

[munkymu]

"But my question to you is, does using traditional or digital art have a major effect on how many people read a comic? What do you, personally, prefer- if you have a preference?"

Good Lord, no. I switched from traditional with digital cleanup to all-digital halfway through and no one said a thing. I'm not sure anyone even noticed.

Lots of comic artists do some sort of combination of traditional and digital.
_________________

[swankivy]

Hell, I don't even ink mine. I post mine on the 'Net in PENCIL. And while I don't think people really read mine because they appreciate the art--and while I don't think it'd survive in print media--the people who follow my kind of story care a lot more about the storytelling. . . .

I'll second what people are saying here about how you should do what you have time for, do what WON'T make you go "oh GOD, time to do THIS CRAP again" come update day, and do what you're most comfortable with. Maybe do something groovy with textures and digital stuff if and when you've got special issues or particular panels that need special attention.
_________________

[Varethane]

Alohilani wrote:

In fact, I'm worried that if I color my comics with markers instead of the GIMP I'll lack visual appeal and people won't read it.

8'C
_________________

[Metruis]

henspacecwb wrote:

Go with what makes you feel comfortable and what you enjoy most.

That.

People don't care what your medium is. But people can see if you're not enjoying it. I digitally inked the first few of my pages and traditionally inked the next few. I didn't enjoy it. It was only after I stopped inking and started doing my art in the way I felt most comfortable--a very non-traditional comic look--that my art really started to stand out. I wasn't having fun when I was doing something I didn't like doing (inking) and it showed in my comic work.

Do something you will enjoy doing. That's the thing with webcomics: not one looks the same.

Do I have a preference? My preference is good art that suits the style of the story. If manga screentones suit the style, so be it. If digital paint suits the style, so be it. If colored pencils suit the story, so be it. Of the comics I follow, every one has their own individual art style that suits the artist and the story they're telling.

Myself, I do digital art without lines. Because that's what I like. Yeah, maybe I lose a few people because my art doesn't look comicky and it doesn't have lines so it's more blurry. But I enjoy doing my pages and am more inclined to put them out on time when I'm doing a style of art I enjoy.

Well done traditional art looks good. Just because most comics ink and then digitally color doesn't mean you have to. That just means that's what that creator likes doing.

Experiment. Find out what makes you go AUGH I NEVER WANT TO DO THIS AGAIN--and then don't do your comic that way.
_________________

[Alohilani]

Wow, thanks, guys. This is the most helpful, informative and friendly forum I've been on.

Well, then it's settled, I'll use my old friends the markers. Thank you, everyone!!!

[Varethane]

Heck man, my comic is not only all-traditional but black and white, and it's doing all right. You should be fine.
_________________