TWCL Forum Index TWCL
Forums for The Webcomic List
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

When and why did Nick Fury become black?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TWCL Forum Index -> General Ramblings
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
darrell31316



Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In Marvel's defense, they were among the first, if not the first to introduce black superheroes, villains and supporting characters, starting back in the mid 60's (Black Panther, The Prowler, Dr. Bill Foster for example).
The motive to make the ultimate Nick Fury black was not to arbitrarily make white characters black. It was to shake readers out of their complacency, to do the unexpected, which is the motive behind most of the changes seen in the ultimate line.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shea



Joined: 30 Nov 1999
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

darrell31316 wrote:

It was to shake readers out of their complacency, to do the unexpected, which is the motive behind most of the changes seen in the ultimate line.


You mean like making Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch a couple? I'm pretty sure some of these are "for the hell of it" decisions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Zaron



Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 946

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

darrell31316 wrote:
The motive to make the ultimate Nick Fury black was not to arbitrarily make white characters black. It was to shake readers out of their complacency, to do the unexpected, which is the motive behind most of the changes seen in the ultimate line.

When I see Marvel take some heroes that are normally black and make them white, then I'll believe this.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
darrell31316



Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zaron wrote:

When I see Marvel take some heroes that are normally black and make them white, then I'll believe this.

You got a point there, gotta agree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
darrell31316



Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shea wrote:
darrell31316 wrote:

It was to shake readers out of their complacency, to do the unexpected, which is the motive behind most of the changes seen in the ultimate line.


You mean like making Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch a couple? I'm pretty sure some of these are "for the hell of it" decisions.


Yeah like that, although I think more thought went into it than "for the hell of it". There is a little bit of logic to that particular decision. I think that making them lovers was intended as a spoof--or an exaggeration-- of the relationship the mainstream Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch used to have during the 60's.

In those early issues of The Avengers and The X-Men, they were portrayed as unusually close siblings, so inseparable that even then it made you wonder about them. You never saw one without the other. They did everything together, whether it was joining the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants, quitting the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants, joining the Avengers, quitting the Avengers and on and on. You would have thought they were lovers the way they fretted over each other's wellbeing.

By the 70's the two of them were portrayed as more independent (and more "normal"). But it's their behavior during the 60's that (I think) gave rise to the idea of making their "ultimate" counterparts lovers.

Sorry, I probably went way, way off topic. I'm kind of a fanboy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Casual Notice
Spambot Extraordinaire


Joined: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 2966
Location: Oh my God, It's full of stars!

PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Either that or Jay Naylor wrote the Avengers Ultimate bible.
_________________
Casual Notice--commentary, comics and an appreciation for snappy hats.
S*P*Q*R
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thefro3po



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 245
Location: Winter Park, FL

PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zaron wrote:

When I see Marvel take some heroes that are normally black and make them white, then I'll believe this.


I think David Hasselhoff could pull off the Blackpanther. Laughing
_________________
“Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lead sharp



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 78
Location: Merseyside

PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thefro3po wrote:
Zaron wrote:

When I see Marvel take some heroes that are normally black and make them white, then I'll believe this.


I think David Hasselhoff could pull off the Blackpanther. Laughing


Now there's a video I want to see.

The fixer (his villain name) in Thunderbolts who had a sort of jet costume, I think it was him that was turned black under the witness protection program or some such.

Quick edit, it was The Beetle!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ashvegas



Joined: 22 Jun 2012
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was wondering what had happened with Nick Fury when he turned up as Samuel L Jackson in the first Iron Man Movie my reaction was WTF (I grew up reading Marvel comics in the 70's and Nick Fury was always this white bloke with a full head of hair) then I found out that the change was done in the Ultimates and they based the new version in the comic on Samuel L Jackson, it was a bit confusing to start but Sam Jackson is definately better than the Hoff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clint Wolf



Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 298

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The story goes that they wanted to use SLJ's likeness for Nick Fury in the Ultimates, and Jackson's deal was something akin to, "I'm okay with this, but if there's ever a movie version, you call me up first." (obviously this was post-Hoff)

I can't remember if it was Mark Millar or Bryan Hitch or both who had the weird brainstorm to basically make Nick Fury be Samuel L. Jackson, but there you are. Millar at least does seem to do a lot of things purely based on cool factor.

I still dream of that alternate universe where there was a bitchin' Nick Fury movie starring Kurt Russell. Barring that, the Avengers was the first time I felt like I was watching Nick Fury the character and not just SLJ. The look is different, but 99% of what I've always loved about Fury was there, and I was duly pleased.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ashvegas



Joined: 22 Jun 2012
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always thought Kurt Russell would have been perfect as Nick Fury, the way I heard the story was that Marvel usesd SLJ's likeness without permission and when he was told about it he contacted Marvel and said he didn't have a problem as long as they cast him in any movie, pretty much boils down to the same thing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Old Herb



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 21

PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

New onset of blacksploitation, maybe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tskingdom



Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 370
Location: Pohjois-Karjala, perkele.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Black Kingpin in Daredevil was bigger "that's not right" moment for me. Certainly not the only thing "not right" in that movie.
_________________
Because some things are for nice people and some things are for nice people with a taste for occasional sightseeing in a Land of Disgust and Sick. http://tskingdom.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Traegorn



Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 157

PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really? Because I thought the only GOOD thing about that film was the casting for Kingpin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Casual Notice
Spambot Extraordinaire


Joined: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 2966
Location: Oh my God, It's full of stars!

PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really? Now the idea of a black Kingpin never bothered me, but Michael Clarke Duncan? I mean the guy exudes less evil than a kitten. Maybe Ving Rhames or the guy who played Will Smith's Uncle in Fresh prince of Bellaire...(or Michael Chiklis, if they went the white route and he wasn't already the Thing).

Actually, the film was cast well (except for MCD), it was just so poorly directed it was almost funny. (On the plus side, without it, we wouldn't have all those Youube AMVs of Bring Me to Life).
_________________
Casual Notice--commentary, comics and an appreciation for snappy hats.
S*P*Q*R
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TWCL Forum Index -> General Ramblings All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Hosted by Fluent
The Webcomics List is operated and owned by Ash Young. Syndicate the comic updates.