TWCL

[FlapjackStudios]

My name's Ryan and write and draw a cool webcomic called Flipside U. I've been drawing since I was a wee lad but got serious about a couple of years ago when I majored in film and animation.

Long story short, I would love it if you gave your thoughts on my work. What are your opinions on my comic? Do you like the style, is it funny, which character do you like or dislike, can you relate to it, who's sexy? Those sorts of things.

I realize art is subjective, that being the case I really hope you dig my art. Haha. ^_^ And that's it! I'm totally open to suggestions and feedback! Please review Flipside U!

Here's the link to my archive: http://flapjackstudios.com/fuarchive.shtml

[Kail]

FlapjackStudios wrote:

Long story short, I would love it if you gave your thoughts on my work. What are your opinions on my comic? Do you like the style, is it funny, which character do you like or dislike, can you relate to it, who's sexy? Those sorts of things.

Visually, it looks really sharp, I think. The only thing that bugged me was that the characters had thin white outlines around them, which I assume is to make them pop, but for some reason kept tweaking the part of my brain that goes "this guy did this comic in MSPaint and couldn't antialias his selections, so the borders look janky". Just a personal thing, probably. Other than that, I thought it looked really good. The style seemed really consistent and solidly executed. Nitpicking the pictures I found a few minor quirks with posing and stuff, but nothing I noticed first time through. Looks good!

Writing I'm less crazy about. Not that it's bad per se, just seems awkward. One of the better word use knowing stuff guys here can probably put this better (or call me on my bullshit) but while I didn't think there's anything really obviously wrong with how it's written, but... it's like, if you've ever had to proofread something written by someone else, and you're like "that's technically not grammatically incorrect, but I would have said it this way instead", that's how I kept feeling.

Like page one, starts off with the girl saying "did you know I'm allergic to onions" and the guy saying "I don't believe you" which seem like weird things to say out of the blue. They weren't eating onions or looking at an onion or anything like that, she just decides to start talking about onions, and he, for equally baffling reasons, decides that she must be lying. The guy then pulls an onion out of his pants (?) and gives it to her to prove that she's allergic to them by eating it (why would you want to do that?) which she does. Then there's a funny shot where she's all puffed up, and I would have maybe amped up the reaction of the guy (seemed a bit subdued) and ended the comic there, but you go one frame further and show her actually suffocating and him calling for a doctor, which I feel isn't really super funny? Like, showing Wile E Coyote getting hit by a bulldozer or something is funny, but seeing grieving loved ones crying as he's wheeled on to an ambulance afterwards, not so much.

Like, it seems to me that none of the stuff I'm whining about above is really a bad idea, I can see how it would all weave together into something funny, it just seems... I dunno, not emphasized right or something? The guy just pulling an onion out of his pants could be funny, but there's no reaction from the girl. The girl deciding to potentially kill herself to prove that she's really allergic to onions could be funny, but the guy seems to act like it's normal. I dunno, maybe decades of sitcoms have rotted my funny bone, but I kept thinking "if this was a TV show, there'd be a laugh track here". Maybe something like a straight man, someone to go "wait, WHAT did you just say?!?!" to emphasize that yes, this is supposed to be a joke and isn't just awkwardly written or something, might go a long way. Or something. Like I said, I'm not a great writer, so feel free to ignore whatever I say.

In terms of characters, I'm not really super involved. Maybe it's because it's only forty-something pages in and there's a ton of them, but I still don't feel like I "get" half of them and the other half feel like unlikeable caricatures. The red haired guy is a really common character in webcomics, the relentlessly "zany" asshole who I resent kind of on principle, but I'm having trouble identifying with any of the others, either. The blue shirt guy seems like normally he'd be the bookish, uptight guy, but here, his only character trait seems to be that he's unimaginably retarded and knows pretty much nothing about anything. The mute guy might be cool, but he never says or does anything except smile. Asian guy (who I wouldn't even have known was Asian if it wasn't constantly pointed out) seems like the only non-retarded one, but he's kind of an asshole and everyone else seems to hate him. For women, there's the girl with the huge lips who seems like a relentless bitch from what little I've seen of her, and the other one, who seems like the most likeable/normal character in the group but whose character is a mystery to me. In one scene, it looks like she's asking a guy to invite her to an orgy, in another, she freaks out and calls a guy a "pervert" for making hand gestures that look like pointing at the ceiling. Not really that this is really a big deal for a wacky hijinks comic, though, since I suppose you don't really need to identify with the characters to find them funny.

In general, the pages I liked best were the weird ones, where it's clear how unrealistic the comic is supposed to be, like when they steal a million Wii-Us or punch through a guy's torso for wearing beige. I think the comic works best when it's really clear that these aren't supposed to be serious or dramatic characters, they're supposed to be funny, and I think those "over the top" kinds of comics establish that really clearly. Number 30 ("Don't you hate it when people in webcomics make this kind of face") and number 39 ("Did you know that images without faces tend to get shared 23% more than other images") were pretty funny, too, I thought.

Anyway, just my 2 cents, feel free to disregard as you see fit. Generally, I thought the comic was really solidly drawn and had a nice consistent look. It was a pleasure to read, keep up the good work!

[FlapjackStudios]

Kail wrote:

FlapjackStudios wrote: Long story short, I would love it if you gave your thoughts on my work. What are your opinions on my comic? Do you like the style, is it funny, which character do you like or dislike, can you relate to it, who's sexy? Those sorts of things. Anyway, just my 2 cents, feel free to disregard as you see fit. Generally, I thought the comic was really solidly drawn and had a nice consistent look. It was a pleasure to read, keep up the good work!

Hey Kail! That is a serious in depth review and I super appreciate the feedback! I'll admit I didn't see some of those inconsistencies there in my comic. I plan on tightening up my writing and developing the characters more so readers can easily understand and relate to them. I hope you continue reading and thanks again for the review!

Also, mad props for picking a few faves too.
_________________

[FlapjackStudios]

Any other takers?

Also, a bit of news. I'm going to restructure my comic soon. Not starting over from stretch per say but ppl who've read it before will be in for a major overhauled treat. I'll give you guys more info when nearing the relaunch.

That said anyone interested in seeing it now, head on over to my archive and tell me what you think.
_________________

[Spencey]

I know you have asked for a review rather than a critique, but this thread might elicit a response from somebody.

I like your artwork, but I think you could mix up your panel layouts and angles to add impact to the writing.

I'll give you an example - page 43 - where the dark-haired lady punches the re-haired fellow in the stomach yet she's still in the seated position as with all the other panels. The punch could not have been all that hard from that position. It doesn't look hard at all and certainly not hard enough to warrant his facial expression. If she gave him a proper exaggerated cartoon punch sending him flying back over the chair, the final panel where she resumes reading would be a bigger contrast and therefore bigger on laughs! I'd recommend reading a book called Action Cartooning by Ben Caldwell.

Otherwise, good stuff! I certainly enjoyed what I read.
_________________