TWCL
Forums for The Webcomic List
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
TWCL Forum Index
->
TWCL Awards
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Font size
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="mooncity"][quote="Casual Notice"]I would suggest a format similar to that used on the Tonys and the Oscars: Nominations are open to anyone even remotely related to webcomics. A comic has to receive five nominations to even be considered. The nominations committee (panel of judges) narrows that to 5 finalists. Those 5 finalists are subjected to a vote by registered members of the TWCL forum (whohave to have accounts before date x to prevent slamming).[/quote] Are we or are we not considering the Big Dogs for eligibillity? I vote no, only because I'm a little bitty pup myself.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Jump to:
Select a forum
The Webcomic List
----------------
How To...
General Ramblings
Webcomic Gubbins
The Dogpile
The "Check out my comic" forum!
Jams and competitions
Webcomics and Real Life
TWCL Awards
Site Problems / Broken Comics
Scraps
Topic review
Author
Message
wendyw
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:35 pm
Post subject:
LukeSurl wrote:
"A miniumum of 30 pages/strips in 2009 is required for entry. The committee will condider on a case-by-case basis exceptions to this if the amount of work per update is evidently far in excess of the norm
(the committee's decisions are final and no correspondance will be entered into)
"
Which is slightly more rigid, but would involve more contentious decisions by the organisers.
I like this option.
LukeSurl
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:02 pm
Post subject:
How about...
"Juries will be encouraged to consider the consistancy of an update schedule and the volume of work produced in the past year as a factor when considering candidates. Those nominating comics are invited to do likewise"
It's fuzzy, but the issue is a grey area.
or
"A miniumum of 30 pages/strips in 2009 is required for entry. The committee will condider on a case-by-case basis exceptions to this if the amount of work per update is evidently far in excess of the norm
(the committee's decisions are final and no correspondance will be entered into)
"
Which is slightly more rigid, but would involve more contentious decisions by the organisers.
jaygee
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:31 am
Post subject:
wendyw wrote:
How about a minimum of four pages per month?
How is "a page" defined? To illustrate this:
Let's say there's a long form comic which updates at a frequency of one page per month. This page contains 4 strips @ 5 panels...Now let's say there's a more cartoony site that updates at a frequency of one strip @ one panel once a week...means, and with regard to above "page per time unit criterium", the long form guys despite offering more material per month wouldn't be eligible...
wendyw
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:41 am
Post subject:
How about a minimum of four pages per month?
jaygee
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:58 am
Post subject:
Chilari wrote:
Might I aslo suggest that comics are eligable if they've constantly updated [...] at a minimum of one page per week...
Not sure about this one. What about people who update once a month only, however, with 5 pages per update...?
LukeSurl
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:37 pm
Post subject:
funnyninjas wrote:
We talk about the "Awards" but what exactly are the awards?
It's not inconcievable that one or two cartoonists might donate one of their books or something like that...
Chilari
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:36 pm
Post subject:
I assumed it'd be a prestige thing, rather than any actual prize. Like the ancient Greeks got laurel wreaths for winning at the Olympic games - worth nothing, financially, but the fame and honour led to sponsorship and influence. But as Zoe said, exposure is what nominated and winning comics will really get out of it.
Zoe Robinson
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:33 pm
Post subject:
funnyninjas wrote:
We talk about the "Awards" but what exactly are the awards?
The chance of more readers; better exposure; a nice little banner to put on your site and people linking to you?
funnyninjas
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:31 pm
Post subject:
We talk about the "Awards" but what exactly are the awards?
Chilari
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:17 pm
Post subject:
ttallan wrote:
Since I don't think anyone really wants to sit through thousands of strips/pages/updates just to review one comic, I would suggest you limit the judgeable content to one calendar year. So for example, you'd nominate a webcomic based on the body of work from 2009, January through December. Or July 2008 to July 2009, whatever. Thus, to qualify for nomination, a webcomic must have been around for at least one year (and, possibly, also have a minimum number of updates, like 50 or something).
Good idea. Judging on previous work could be damaging to the comic's chances if they've improved significantly and, as you've said, time consuming.
Might I aslo suggest that comics are eligable if they've constantly updated for a minimum of one year (except the new comic category), at a minimum of one page per week, and must not have been on hiatus for longer than 2 months in the 12 month period we're counting (assuming ttallan's suggestion is implemented).
ttallan
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:09 pm
Post subject:
Since I don't think anyone really wants to sit through thousands of strips/pages/updates just to review one comic, I would suggest you limit the judgeable content to one calendar year. So for example, you'd nominate a webcomic based on the body of work from 2009, January through December. Or July 2008 to July 2009, whatever. Thus, to qualify for nomination, a webcomic must have been around for at least one year (and, possibly, also have a minimum number of updates, like 50 or something).
wendyw
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:03 pm
Post subject:
Well, Ash gave it the green light as a Webcomic List project so I'd assume there'd be no problem with it being hosted on the site.
Chilari
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:01 pm
Post subject:
LukeSurl wrote:
...another month to actually build a working site...
Hmm, there's a point. Where will the site be? Will Ash let it be part of the TWCL site? Or will it be better to host it off-site? And what will the awards actually be called - is "the webcomic awards" too generic, as Wendy suggests, or will it suffice? We'll need to decide this before getting the website sorted.
wendyw
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:49 pm
Post subject:
I'm personally against using a generic name for the awards. The Webcomic Awards to me sounds both bland and a little bit egotistical, as if it's the definitive article.
To us The Webcomic List is mostly this forum, but it is primarily a comic listing site, and a well established one at that. Personally I don't see how it can be at all harmful to have the awards named after it.
As for what comics should be allowed to enter. All of them that have been going long enough and have enough strips. The only logical limitation I can see is to exclude the comics of judges and the people directly responsible for running it.
LukeSurl
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:15 pm
Post subject:
Quote:
1. How the competition will be judged - everyone can nominate and vote, only webcartoonists, or a mixture of webcartoonists and judges.
I like the idea of a jury - or perhaps several juries for different awards. However it is not feasible to expect a jury to judge every single comic that puts themselves forward. The idea someone mentioned earlier of webcomic-creator voting to produce a shortlist seemed quite nice, and probably workable.
Quote:
2. If we're limiting either the nomination or voting list, how do we chose to limit it?
You mean those eligable to vote, right? I guess anyone who is involved in creating a webcomic which, as of [date] has [X] updates
(any exceptions to this rule will be considered by the committe. The committe's decision in such matters is final and no correspondance will be entered into)
Quote:
3. If we're using judges, how do we decide who they will be? Do we keep it in TWCL or ask outsiders?
Tricky. As long as we're not asking them to do too much work I recon we could get some quite respected names from comics/webcomics. I'd steer clear of having many, or perhaps even
any
, people from TWCL forums as this leaves us open to allegations of insularism (esp. if someone from the forums wins something).
Quote:
4. What sort of time scale are we looking at? Coincide with the Oscars or the Beacon or whatever?
Of the top of my head, I guess it may take one month to decide on format and all that, another month to actually build a working site, another month or two for intial nominations and for sufficient publicity to go round the relavent spheres, and then 1 month each for each round of voting/judging.
Quote:
5. How do we decide which comics go from the nomination stage to the voting stage, and how many comics then get shortlisted?
In most awards final shorlists are somewhere in the 4 - 7 range. Your other question? Not sure.
Is there anything else that can be discussed at this stage? Perhaps we should have new threads for some of these topics.[/quote]
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Hosted by
Fluent
The Webcomics List
is operated and owned by
Ash Young
.
Syndicate
the comic updates.